Research cases, not client testimonials

Compare the question.
Then compare the evidence.

These projects differ in period, sample, purpose and evidential strength. Keeping those differences visible prevents a long research history from being compressed into one promotional claim.

Proof matrix

Two programmes in context.

Research programme comparison
DimensionSchool-entry researchPreschool support programme
PeriodData collected 2006–2010; monograph published 2022Final research report, 2024
Sample493 children from seven settlements81 children from two kindergartens
Primary questionHow do cumulative risk, protective factors and resilience relate to school entry and later adaptation?Do cognitive, behavioural and adult-rated resilience indicators change during a targeted programme?
DataSupport-service assessments, school-readiness measures, cognitive tests, risk indicators and adaptation outcomesCognitive assessment, MSSST screening, parent and educator Conners questionnaires, parent and educator resilience ratings
Strongest contributionLonger developmental perspective and differentiated resilience groupingsDetailed pre–post values with multiple informants and explicit programme reflection
Main boundaryHistorical regional dataset; observational interpretationRegional, non-representative sample; no randomised control group
Public outputReziliencia és iskolakezdés (2022)Final research report (2024)

Cross-project lessons

What remains stable across both programmes?

Inspect the current study

See the reported values—not only the summary.

The findings page places every selected metric beside its instrument note and limitations.

Open the findings